Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-09-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 8.43 ounces |
| Black | Space Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2448 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a bit better than the Asus ROG Phone 6D's general score of 79.8. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's design is just a bit lighter and a bit thinner than Asus ROG Phone 6D, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and Asus ROG Phone 6D has Android 12 version.
Asus ROG Phone 6D counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little lower pixel amount in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2448px and a bit bigger display. The Asus ROG Phone 6D has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a lot better processing power than Asus ROG Phone 6D, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Asus ROG Phone 6D features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 48 percent greater battery capacity. Asus ROG Phone 6D counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a much better video resolution, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.