Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2024-03-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.90 ounces |
| Black | Desert Sand, Eternal Black, Misty Grey and Skyline Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 7.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a bit better than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra's global score of 76.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a lot older and somewhat thicker than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, it's construction is still just a bit lighter. These phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version while Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has Android 14 version.
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra features a more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little bit bigger display. The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra has a greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a very superior hardware performance than Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra features a superior battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5500mAh battery capacity.
Asus Zenfone 11 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photos, it also counts with a much higher video definition, a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.