Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-07-12 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.16 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.62 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, getting an 81 score against 77.5. The Galaxy XCover Pro design is extremely newer, but heavier and thicker than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe. Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better processing power than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a higher number of cores (although slower).
The Galaxy XCover Pro features just a bit better display than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a just a little better pixel density, a quite bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Asus ZenFone 3 Deluxe counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures in poorly lited environments and a camera in the back with a worse 23 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition and a way larger camera sensor capturing way higher quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.