Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-02-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a bit better than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom's general score of 76.2. Although the Galaxy XCover Pro is extremely newer than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, it's incredibly thicker and much heavier. Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a little bit smaller screen, a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a little less pixels per inch of display.
The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better performance than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% larger battery size. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor shooting way worse quality photographs and videos, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a way better 25 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.