Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-05-25 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.26 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Black and Silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a bit better than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019)'s general score of 77.8. Even being the best we are comparing, the Galaxy XCover Pro design is a bit thicker and heavier than the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019). Both phones we are comparing include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System).
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has 2 GB more RAM. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite lower pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Asus ZenFone 6 (2019) has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures, it also counts with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a way higher video quality and a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy XCover Pro is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.