Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-12-11 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is slightly better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2)'s 77.4 score. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy XCover Pro is a newer device than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), although it's way heavier and somewhat thicker.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro both have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has a greater amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, they both have a same size display.
Galaxy XCover Pro shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), because although it has a much smaller sensor taking less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher 25 megapixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low-light environments.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) features a much bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has improved battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.