Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black | Blue and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 has a global score of 81.1, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's overall score of 81. Google Nexus 6 is a much older and a little thicker cellphone than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but Google was able to build it lighter anyway. These devices include Android OS, but the Google Nexus 6 has the older 5.1 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11.
Google Nexus 6 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Google Nexus 6 has a better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels amount in each inch of screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
Galaxy XCover Pro has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features improved battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy XCover Pro shoots clearer videos and photos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a camera with way more mega pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy XCover Pro. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.