Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a general score of 82.5, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's general score of 81. The Google Pixel 2 XL is an extremely older device than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but Google was able to build it extremely thinner and much lighter anyway. Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and the Google Pixel 2 XL both count with really similar processors, both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 2 XL features a camera that is just as good as the camera in Galaxy XCover Pro, because although the Google Pixel 2 XL has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos and a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos and a lot higher video resolution.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 2 XL is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.