Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3, getting a score of 81 against 80. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro construction is newer than the Google Pixel 3's, although it's thicker and much heavier. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better processor than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Google Pixel 3 features just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2160px resolution, it also counts with a quite better display density. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 3 features a camera that's very similar to the Galaxy XCover Pro one, because although the Google Pixel 3 has a tinier aperture and a camera in the back with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 39 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.