Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL's 78.9 general score. Galaxy XCover Pro's body is somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier than Google Pixel 3a XL. Both devices we are comparing here come with the same Android 11 operating system. Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit superior CPU than Google Pixel 3a XL. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340, a quite bigger display and a just a little better screen density. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features much more memory to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and Google Pixel 3a XL both feature extremely similar cameras, because although the Google Pixel 3a XL has a camera with a way worse 12.2 megapixels resolution and a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.