Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, with an 82.9 score against 81. Google Pixel 4 XL is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than Galaxy XCover Pro, although they were released with only 3 months difference. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a higher pixel count per inch in the display. Galaxy XCover Pro has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a camera that is just as good as Galaxy XCover Pro's camera, because although the Google Pixel 4 XL has a camera with a way worse 12.2 MP resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much better (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little bit longer battery life than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Although Google Pixel 4 XL is a better device, it costs more than the Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy XCover Pro. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy XCover Pro, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.