Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is slightly better than Galaxy XCover Pro, with a score of 82.9 against 81. The Google Pixel 4a body is somewhat thinner and notably lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro, although both of them were released only a few months apart. Both phones in this comparison come with the same Android 11 OS.
The Google Pixel 4a has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a bit greater pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 4a's CPU is very similar to the CPU in Galaxy XCover Pro, and although the Google Pixel 4a has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Google Pixel 4a has a camera that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's camera, because although the Google Pixel 4a has a lot lower resolution camera, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way bigger back camera sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Google Pixel 4a is also a bargain compared to others, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.