Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's general score of 81. Both of these phones include the same Android 11 OS. The Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer device, and it's also thinner and way lighter than the Galaxy XCover Pro. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back camera with a way lower resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a way higher video definition and a much larger sensor.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 4050mAh battery size against 3885mAh.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G costs more money than Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.