Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's general score of 81. The Google Pixel 5 design is thinner and way lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro, even when both of them were released only a couple months apart. Google Pixel 5 has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 5 also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a little greater quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has more memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Google Pixel 5's battery duration is just as good as the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although the Google Pixel 5 also has 4080mAh of battery capacity. Google Pixel 5 counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a much less MP back camera, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a way better (4K) video definition.
The Google Pixel 5 costs more than Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.