Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than Honor 50 Pro's score of 77. Both devices in this comparison review use the same Android 11 operating system. Even being the best we compare here, we must tell that it's also an older, notably thicker and somewhat heavier phone.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a little better performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor 50 Pro also has more RAM. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a quite bigger screen, a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly higher resolution of 1236 x 2676.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way higher video quality and a way better resolution camera in the back. The Honor 50 Pro features a greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.