Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a bit better than HTC U Ultra's 77 score. Galaxy XCover Pro's design is incredibly newer than the HTC U Ultra's, although it's noticeably thicker and notably heavier. The HTC U Ultra counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The HTC U Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit superior processor than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher number of cores.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. HTC U Ultra has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way worse resolution back-facing camera and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting pictures or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a way better video quality.
Galaxy XCover Pro is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.