Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than HTC U11, with a score of 81 against 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro body is newer, but noticeably heavier and noticeably thicker than the HTC U11. HTC U11 counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel count per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
HTC U11 has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The HTC U11 features a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the HTC U11 also counts with a way better video definition and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than HTC U11, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much longer battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC U11. If you want to save some money, you can get HTC U11, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.