Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than LG G7 Fit, having an 81 score against 77. Even though Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than the LG G7 Fit, it's extremely heavier and notably thicker. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version and LG G7 Fit has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a larger number of cores (and they are faster). LG G7 Fit counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a higher pixel density.
The LG G7 Fit features a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a way better battery duration than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 35% larger battery capacity.
LG G7 Fit's camera is just as good as the Galaxy XCover Pro one, because although the LG G7 Fit has a way tinier diafragm aperture and a much less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a much bigger sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.