Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a general score of 81 against 81. LG G7 ThinQ is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's noticeably lighter and much thinner anyway. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the LG G7 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version, providing you some extra features and some performance improvements.
LG G7 ThinQ has a much better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and more pixels per inch of display. The LG G7 ThinQ features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM memory.
LG G7 ThinQ features a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG G7 ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 4050mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
The LG G7 ThinQ takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with way less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video quality, a bigger aperture and a much larger sensor taking much better quality photos.
The LG G7 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.