Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-31 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 82.7 score against 81. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8X ThinQ has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. The LG G8X ThinQ is a thinner and lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even though both were released only 3 months apart.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ features a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little lower pixel amount in each inch in the display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG G8X ThinQ features just a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG G8X ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.