Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black | Titan gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with a global score of 85.4 against 81. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG K92 has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. The LG K92 construction is newer, just a little lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit superior CPU than LG K92, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a little more vivid screen than LG K92, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit better screen pixel density.
The LG K92 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for taking photographs in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos, a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a way higher video definition.
LG K92 features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit longer battery duration than LG K92, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The LG K92 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy XCover Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.