Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a score of 81, which is a bit better than LG V10's global score of 78.6. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the newer 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version. Galaxy XCover Pro is a a lot newer cellphone than LG V10, but it's thicker and somewhat heavier.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a better performance than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher number of cores. LG V10 features a much better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixel amount per inch of display.
The LG V10 has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V10 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
LG V10 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution camera in the back and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution and a lot larger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG V10. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy LG V10, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.