Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. The LG V35 ThinQ body is extremely thinner and notably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, despite of the fact that it was released around 20 months before. LG V35 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a better pixels number per inch of display.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V35 ThinQ takes clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 16 MP resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way bigger camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features improved battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 23 percent greater battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V35 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.