Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 global score. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the LG V40 ThinQ has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. The LG V40 ThinQ is an older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but LG was able to make it lighter and incredibly thinner anyway.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a better pixel count per inch in the display, a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a little bit larger display. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V40 ThinQ takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low light situations, a much better (4K) video quality and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photographs.
Galaxy XCover Pro features longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG V40 ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.