Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black | Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has an overall score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's score of 81. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so they should count with all the same OS features. LG V60 ThinQ's body is thinner and a little bit lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro, even though they were released with only 2 months difference.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG V60 ThinQ has a screen that's very similar to Galaxy XCover Pro's screen, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a little bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution.
The LG V60 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V60 ThinQ captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a way bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures.
The LG V60 ThinQ features longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.