Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-06-17 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| Black | Black and Forged Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro has an overall score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Defy (2021)'s 77.2 score. The Galaxy XCover Pro construction is just a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than the Motorola Defy (2021), despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit faster CPU than Motorola Defy (2021). They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a more vivid screen than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Motorola Defy (2021) and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro feature extremely similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both have exactly the same internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola Defy (2021) captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola Defy (2021) also has faster 60 fps video frame rates, a much bigger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
The Motorola Defy (2021) features improved battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.