Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's general score of 81. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version. Although Motorola edge and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro were only released with a few months difference, Motorola edge is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more vivid display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Motorola edge features a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola edge counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola edge also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola edge features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photographs or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a much bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos and a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
Motorola edge has just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4050mAh.
The Motorola edge is more expensive than Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.