Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a score of 86.1 against 81. The Motorola Edge 20 is a newer device, and it's also extremely thinner and extremely lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. These devices work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
The Motorola Edge 20 and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro both count with quite similar displays, because although the Motorola Edge 20 has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger display and a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 20 has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 20 shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much better video definition. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 20, because it has a 1 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.