Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting an 87.1 score against 81. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite is a newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. These phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 20 Lite shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.