Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a score of 92.8, which is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's overall score of 81. Motorola Edge 20 Pro is a newer phone, and it is also notably thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a more recent 12 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.