Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | Mineral Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a general score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. The Motorola Edge (2022) construction is extremely newer, extremely lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge (2022) has a more recent 12 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11.
The Motorola Edge (2022) and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro both feature quite similar screens, because although the Motorola Edge (2022) has a little bit lower pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy XCover Pro has more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has more RAM. The Motorola Edge (2022) takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge (2022) costs more than Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.