Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2024-06-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 549.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 710 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Motorola Edge (2024), with a overall score of 81 against 78.5. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge (2024) has Android 14 version. Although Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Motorola Edge (2024), it must be noted that it's also noticeably older, somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier.
Motorola Edge (2024) has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Edge (2024) has a greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge (2024), although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge (2024) captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera in the back with a much better 50 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Edge (2024) has longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23 percent greater battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.