Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with a score of 81 against 78.5. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it must be told that it is also a way older, much heavier and incredibly thicker device. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a little sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite lower amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a much larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and a way higher resolution back camera.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has just a little bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 9% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.