Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with a global score of 81 against 80.9. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version. Although it's the best in our current comparison, the Galaxy XCover Pro is a way older, a little heavier and somewhat thicker phone than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has greater battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing images and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a much more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.