Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40, with a overall score of 81 against 77.2. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover Pro has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 has Android 13 version. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device than Motorola Edge 40, it must be told that it's also an extremely older, a lot heavier and much thicker device.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 40, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 40 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Motorola Edge 40 features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a way better (4K) video definition, a way bigger sensor, a larger aperture and a way better 50 mega pixels resolution back camera. Galaxy XCover Pro has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 40 features a little better battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 9 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.