Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, with a general score of 81 against 77. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the Galaxy XCover Pro body is notably older, extremely heavier and much thicker than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy XCover Pro has 11 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has more memory to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 40 Neo captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos, a lot better (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.