Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro's general score of 81. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version, giving you some extra features and enhanced performance.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP, a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.