Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | -- |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 7.76 ounces | -- |
| Black | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), getting an 81 score against 78.9. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy XCover Pro has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has Android 14. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has a quite smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel amount in each screen inch. Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a much more mega pixels camera and a way higher video definition.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) counts with a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.