Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a bit worse pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and video and a lot bigger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.