Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LTPS |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having a global score of 81.5 against 81. The Moto G 5G construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's just a little lighter. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Moto G 5G has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit faster processing unit than Moto G 5G. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better looking screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Motorola Moto G 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way higher video resolution. Moto G 5G counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Moto G 5G also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.