Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, with a global score of 82.6 against 81. Although the Moto G 5G Plus and the Galaxy XCover Pro were only released 5 months apart, the Moto G 5G Plus is thinner and just a bit lighter. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a screen that's very similar to the screen in Galaxy XCover Pro, and although the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a little bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels, they both have the same quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Moto G 5G Plus has a processing unit that is just as good as the Galaxy XCover Pro one, both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh. The Moto G 5G Plus features a better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a much more MP back camera, a much better (4K) video resolution and a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.