Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | Smoke black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Power's global score of 76.1. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding operating system features. Despite being the best device in this comparison review, it must be noted that it is also a a little thicker and just a bit heavier device.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Power. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher count of pixels in each screen inch and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Motorola Moto G Power shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution camera, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a way better video resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality pictures.
The Motorola Moto G Power's storage capacity for games and applications is very similar to the Galaxy XCover Pro one, both have the same 64 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G Power has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4050mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Power. If you want to save some money, you can get Moto G Power, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.