Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.28 ounces |
| Black | Flash gray, Glowing blue (retail only) and Polar silver (retail only) |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 160.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Moto G Power (2021), getting a general score of 81 against 76.5. The Galaxy XCover Pro is an older, a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker phone than Moto G Power (2021). The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little better performance than Motorola Moto G Power (2021). Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a much better looking display than Moto G Power (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way greater pixel quantity per inch in the display and a lot better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. Moto G Power (2021) captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and a same size aperture, the Moto G Power (2021) also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a camera with much more megapixels and faster 60 fps video frame rate.
The Moto G Power (2021)'s memory to store more games and applications is just as good as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's one, both of them have an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and equal internal memory. Motorola Moto G Power (2021) counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G Power (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Power (2021). So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto G Power (2021), resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.