Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021)'s overall score of 79.3. Although the Galaxy XCover Pro is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), we must tell that it's also older, thicker and just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better looking display than Moto G Stylus (2021), because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bit better pixel density.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit better processor than Moto G Stylus (2021). They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores. The Moto G Stylus (2021) takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Moto G Stylus (2021) also has a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021) also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus (2021), because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto G Stylus (2021), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Stylus (2021). If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Moto G Stylus (2021), letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.