Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-06-14 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.67 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic Emerald |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has an overall score of 82.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) design is newer, a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a little bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater number of pixels in each inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021). Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also counts with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy XCover Pro, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.