Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2023-06-02 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), with a overall score of 81 against 76. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is an a lot older, a bit heavier and a bit thicker phone than the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023). Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has older 11 version while Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has Android 13.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much powerful processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy XCover Pro features a little more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite higher pixel quantity in each screen inch.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and videos in low light environments, and they both have a same size sensor, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a much higher 50 MP resolution camera.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.