Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro, having an 86.2 score against 81. The Moto G200 5G design is newer, thinner and a bit lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro. These devices include the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. Motorola Moto G200 5G features a screen that's very similar to the Galaxy XCover Pro one, because although the Motorola Moto G200 5G has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G200 5G features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G200 5G also has more RAM.
Motorola Moto G200 5G features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% bigger battery capacity. The Moto G200 5G takes greater photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.