Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-02-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black | Pastel sky and Phantom black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Moto G30, getting a overall score of 81 against 78.1. Although it's the best phone in this review, the Galaxy XCover Pro design is older, just a little heavier and just a little thicker than Moto G30. The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G30. They have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a brighter screen than Moto G30, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a lot greater screen pixels density. Motorola Moto G30 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G30 also has faster video frame rate and a back camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G30 features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Motorola Moto G30 also has 128 GB internal memory. Motorola Moto G30 features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4050mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.