Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is slightly better than the Moto G51 5G, having an 81 score against 77.8. Despite being the best in this comparison, it must be noted that it's also an older, a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone. Both devices in this comparison review work with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't see any differences in that aspect.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit better screen density. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G51 5G. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores.
Moto G51 5G's storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to the Galaxy XCover Pro one, they have the same 64 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Moto G51 5G counts with better battery life than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 23% bigger battery capacity.
The Motorola Moto G51 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution and faster 240 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.