Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-04-19 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Blue and Gray |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G6 Plus's score of 77.5. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro design is newer, but incredibly thicker and a lot heavier than the Motorola Moto G6 Plus. Motorola Moto G6 Plus features a display that is very similar to the Galaxy XCover Pro one, and although the Motorola Moto G6 Plus has a quite smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2160px resolution, they both have the same number of pixels per display inch.
Moto G6 Plus features a processing unit that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro one, and although the Moto G6 Plus has 2 GB more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G6 Plus, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G6 Plus's camera is just as good as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's camera, because although the Motorola Moto G6 Plus has a back-facing camera with lot less megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, it also counts with a much larger sensor and a way better video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has superior battery performance than Moto G6 Plus, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.